Bible Network Crypto DeFi Onchain RWA AI Agent Stablecoin Chain SAFU CryptoTax DeFAI AGI Claude Me Claude Skill Claude Design Claude Cowork
Independent Media
Not affiliated with any project
The Deepest Crypto Knowledge Base
crypto-bible.com
LATEST
Why Your Stop-Loss Always Gets Hunted First: A Complete Crypto Position Sizing and Risk Management Guide  ·  Is PoS or PoW More Secure? The Real Difference Between Miners and Validators — And Why the Answer Is More Complicated Than You Think  ·  You Got a Call from 'Binance Support' That Sounded Completely Real: How AI Voice Deepfake Scams Are Fooling Even Experienced Crypto Users  ·  Why Token Unlocks Always Catch You at the Top: A Complete Guide to Vesting Schedules  ·  Wrapped Tokens Explained: Why Bitcoin Needs a 'Disguise' to Trade on Ethereum  ·  Stablecoin Depeg Mechanics: From UST Collapse to USDC Trust Crisis—Who's Next?
Glossary · blockchain-fundamentals

EIP (Ethereum Improvement Proposal)

blockchain-fundamentals Intermediate

Full Explanation +
01 · What is this?

Are EIP and ERC the same thing? What exactly are ERC-20 and ERC-721?

EIP is the broad category; ERC is a sub-category of EIP specifically for defining 'application-layer standards.'

ERC stands for Ethereum Request for Comments, with naming inspired by the early internet's RFC document system. ERC-type EIPs don't change Ethereum's core protocol — instead, they define 'if you want to build a certain type of application on Ethereum, what interface standard should your smart contract follow?' These standards allow different contracts to communicate with each other, enabling exchanges, wallets, and DeFi protocols to read any standard-compliant token in a unified way.

ERC-20 (proposed 2015, now the foundation of the DeFi ecosystem): Defines the 'Fungible Token' interface standard. Fungible tokens are identical and interchangeable — like dollar bills, your $1 and my $1 are completely equivalent. USDC, UNI, LINK, AAVE, and virtually all major DeFi tokens are ERC-20 tokens. ERC-20 defines core functions: transfer(), approve(), balanceOf(), etc. — allowing any ERC-20 token to be handled by any wallet or protocol supporting the standard.

ERC-721 (proposed 2018, technical foundation of NFTs): Defines the 'Non-Fungible Token' standard. Non-fungible means each token is unique (like a specific painting — no two are identical). CryptoPunks, Bored Ape Yacht Club, NBA Top Shot NFTs are all ERC-721 tokens. Each ERC-721 token has a unique tokenId; ownership is queried via ownerOf(tokenId).

Additionally, ERC-1155 is the 'multi-token standard' — a single contract managing both ERC-20-type (fungible) and ERC-721-type (non-fungible) tokens simultaneously. Widely used in gaming item systems.

02 · Why does it exist?

Why is EIP-1559 so important? What did it change?

EIP-1559 is the most significant fee mechanism reform in Ethereum's history, activated in August 2021 with the London Hard Fork. It restructured Ethereum's transaction fee system and directly impacted ETH's monetary policy.

Old fee mechanism (pre-EIP-1559): 'Auction model' — users bid a Gas Price; miners prioritized highest-bidding transactions; all Gas Fees went to miners. Problems: Gas Fee volatility was extreme (normal ~10 Gwei, spiking to 500+ Gwei during hot periods); users struggled to predict reasonable bids; 'Gas wars' were common.

EIP-1559's new mechanism: Transaction fees split into two parts: Base Fee + Priority Fee (Tip). The Base Fee is automatically calculated by the protocol, dynamically adjusting based on the previous block's utilization rate (rising when blocks near capacity, falling when idle), and the Base Fee is burned directly rather than paid to miners/validators. The Tip goes to validators as extra incentive; users set their maximum fee (Max Fee) and actually pay = Base Fee + Tip (not exceeding Max Fee).

Why it matters: First, fees are more predictable — users know approximately what the next block's Base Fee will be without guessing. Second, Base Fee burning directly impacts ETH supply — during high network usage periods (DeFi boom, NFT bull market), burn rate can exceed new issuance, making ETH a deflationary asset (the core basis for the 'Ultrasound Money' narrative). As of end-2024, over 4 million ETH had been burned since EIP-1559 activation — the single most impactful change to Ethereum's monetary policy.

03 · How does it affect your decisions?

How long does the EIP process take from proposal to adoption? Who has decision-making power?

An EIP can take anywhere from months to years to go from submission to formal activation — and there's no formal voting mechanism. Decisions are reached through community consensus, not token voting.

Standard process: Draft → Review → Last Call → Final. Most EIPs go quiet at the Draft or Review stage; only a small number reach Final.

Who has actual decision-making power: Ethereum has no formal central voting mechanism, but several key participants matter: Core developer teams (client developers including Geth, Prysm, Lighthouse, Besu, and others) are the most important technical gatekeepers, discussing and deciding which EIPs enter the next upgrade fork in regular ACD (All Core Devs) calls. Ethereum Foundation researchers (including Vitalik Buterin) have significant proposal and directional influence but no formal single-vote authority. Large mining pools (PoW era) / large validators (PoS era), exchanges, and DeFi protocols can 'signal' support but cannot force an EIP to be accepted. The community (users, developers, token holders) influences discussion direction through forums (Ethereum Magicians, EthResearch) and social media, but also has no formal voting rights.

An example: EIP-4337 (Account Abstraction) — proposed in 2021, with the smart account standard widely deployed on mainnet by 2023 — took approximately 2 years, going through extensive technical discussion, multiple revisions, and testnet validation. This 'slow but decentralized' process is considered both Ethereum's strength (no small group can force through controversial upgrades) and what critics call Ethereum's 'too slow to upgrade' problem.

04 · What should you do?

Do regular users need to understand EIPs? What direct impact do EIPs have on my assets?

Regular users don't need to understand EIP technical details, but knowing 'which EIPs are under discussion or about to activate' has practical implications for your holdings and operations. Several EIP types directly affect regular users:

EIPs affecting fee structure (like EIP-1559, EIP-4844) directly impact your Gas costs. EIP-4844 (Cancun upgrade, March 2024) introduced Blob transactions, significantly reducing Layer 2 Gas costs (Arbitrum and Optimism fees dropped 80–90%). If you're primarily a Layer 2 user, this directly lowered your transaction costs.

EIPs affecting Ethereum staking mechanics affect your staking yields and risks. Every Ethereum protocol upgrade may change validator behavior rules, Slashing conditions, and withdrawal mechanics. Around major upgrades, staking platform tokens like stETH (Lido, Coinbase, etc.) may experience short-term volatility.

ERCs defining token standards (ERC-20, ERC-721, ERC-4626) affect the protocol designs you use. If you deposit into a DeFi protocol, your position may be an ERC-4626 token (standardized yield vault); if the NFT you trade supports ERC-2981 (royalty standard), artists automatically receive royalties on every resale.

Resources to track EIPs: The official EIP registry is eips.ethereum.org; Week in Ethereum News (weekinethereumnews.com) compiles the latest EIP developments weekly, suitable for non-technical users. Tracking 'which EIPs have entered Accepted / Final status' lets you learn about the next Ethereum hard fork's major changes before most people, giving you more time to prepare.

Real-World Example +

How EIP-4844 (Cancun Upgrade) Crashed Your L2 Gas Fees 90% in March 2024

On March 13, 2024, the Ethereum Cancun-Deneb upgrade activated. Its most significant change was EIP-4844 (Proto-Danksharding), introducing a new transaction type called 'Blob transactions' — allowing Layer 2s (Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, zkSync, etc.) to publish data to Ethereum mainnet far more cheaply. Each Blob holds approximately 128KB of temporary data storage, retained for only ~18 days, at far lower cost than permanently storing data in the old Calldata format. Result: in the first week after the upgrade, Arbitrum's average transaction fee dropped from ~$0.30 to $0.02–0.04; Optimism/Base saw similar reductions; zkSync and Starknet also experienced significant decreases. This shift transformed L2s from 'somewhat cheaper than mainnet' to 'cheap enough for small-amount operations that weren't economical before.' For ETH holders primarily operating on L2, EIP-4844 was one of the most tangibly felt protocol upgrades in recent years — not an abstract security improvement, but a real, felt fee collapse.

Diagram
EIP Lifecycle — From Draft to Mainnet Activation橫向流程圖,展示 EIP 從提交到最終激活的五個主要階段(Draft → Review → Last Call → Final → Hardfork 激活),以及每個階段的主要參與者和決策節點,並標注知名 EIP 的時間軸案例。 EIP Lifecycle — From Idea to Mainnet Draft Anyone can submit via GitHub PR Review Core devs + community discussion Last Call Final 2-week public review window Final Accepted as standard; awaits fork Hardfork Activation Bundled into named upgrade (London, Merge, Shanghai, Cancun...) Stagnant / Withdrawn (most EIPs end here) Notable EIP Timeline Examples EIP-20 (ERC-20) Proposed: Nov 2015 Final: Sept 2017 ~2yr · Fungible token standard EIP-1559 Proposed: Apr 2019 Activated: Aug 2021 ~2.5yr · London Fork EIP-4844 Proposed: Feb 2022 Activated: Mar 2024 ~2yr · Cancun Fork · L2 -90% EIP-3675 (The Merge) Proposed: Jul 2021 Activated: Sept 2022 ~14mo · PoW → PoS Key insight: Most impactful EIPs take 1.5–3 years from proposal to mainnet activation Track at: eips.ethereum.org · Follow ACD (All Core Devs) calls for upcoming fork decisions Crypto Bible · crypto-bible.com
Feel free to share. Please credit the source.
Common Misconceptions +
✕ Misconception 1
× Misconception: An EIP being submitted means it will be adopted. The vast majority of EIPs never reach Final status — they stagnate, get rejected, or are abandoned at the Draft or Review stage. 'A feature has an EIP' doesn't mean it will be added to Ethereum. You need to track whether it enters the formal planning of a specific Hard Fork to know it's actually coming.
✕ Misconception 2
× Misconception: Ethereum token holders can vote on EIPs. Ethereum protocol upgrades are not decided by token voting — ETH holdings give you no direct EIP decision-making power. Decision-making power lies with core developers (who can implement in clients), node operators (who choose whether to upgrade), and miners/validators (who choose which fork to run) — not token holders.
The Missing Link +
Direct Impact

The EIP process's greatest strength is that 'anyone can propose; final decisions are made by technical and community consensus' — making Ethereum upgrades hard for any single entity or interest group to control. But this design has an obvious cost: upgrades are slow, and controversial proposals often fall into extended debate (Ethereum's sharding roadmap has been discussed for years, with the route revised multiple times). Another limitation is 'opaque consensus mechanics' — nominally no formal voting, but core developers and the Ethereum Foundation's views carry enormous informal influence in practice, making 'fully decentralized governance' a somewhat more optimistic description than reality. By contrast, Solana or BNB Chain have more centralized upgrade decision-making — faster upgrades, but less decentralized. The EIP mechanism reflects Ethereum's choice of 'governance decentralization' over 'upgrade speed.'

Ask a Question
Please enter at least 10 characters